{"id":582,"date":"2019-04-29T14:17:22","date_gmt":"2019-04-29T14:17:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.johnwhittingdale.co.uk\/?p=582"},"modified":"2021-08-18T08:15:14","modified_gmt":"2021-08-18T08:15:14","slug":"exiting-the-eu-sanctions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/?p=582","title":{"rendered":"Exiting the EU Sanctions"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"PhotoJohn Whittingdale<\/span> Conservative, Maldon<\/small> <\/a> 7:02 pm, 29th April 2019 <\/a><\/h2>\n
\n

It is a pleasure to hear that the importance of rolling over these sanctions is supported on both sides of the House. My right hon. Friend Alistair Burt<\/a> spoke with considerable knowledge and authority about the sanctions against Syria. I will concentrate on another of the three countries on whom this set of sanctions will be maintained: Belarus.<\/p>\n

I chair the all-party parliamentary group on Belarus in this place<\/a>, and last year led an Inter-Parliamentary Union<\/a> delegation to Minsk. Later this year, we will be inviting Belarus to pay a return visit and send a delegation to visit the UK. The explanatory memorandum to these sanctions regulations refers to the need for respect of \u201cdemocratic principles and institutions\u201d in Belarus; but one has to say that there is still some way to go. The Parliament in Minsk and the parliamentary institutions of Belarus are not quite as we would recognise in this country. Those who do sit in Parliament have been largely appointed by the President, and those who were not appointed directly have certainly been approved by the President in taking up their position. The President<\/a> himself first took office in 1994. He has won several elections since then, usually by over 90% of the vote, and the bodies that have observed those elections\u2014not least the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe<\/a>\u2014have raised considerable concerns about their validity.<\/p>\n

Belarus is also undoubtedly still firmly within the Russian orbit, and one has to accept that its room for manoeuvre is severely limited by what the Kremlin allows. Having said that, there are some signs of progress. Belarus did not recognise the Russian occupation of South Ossetia<\/a>, of Abkhazia or of Crimea, and there are signs that it wishes to edge away and that some progress is being made. It was for that reason that the IPU<\/a> decided that it was worthwhile to send a delegation to encourage further steps of progress, and I pay tribute to our excellent ambassador in Minsk, who is pressing for reform while also seeking to ensure that we have relations with the Government and institutions of Belarus.<\/p>\n

There are also economic opportunities in Belarus, as Douglas Chapman<\/a>pointed out. The UK<\/a> is a considerable market for Belarus exports. I have to say that Belarus is a rather smaller market for UK exports, but nevertheless there is an opportunity there. However, when it comes to human rights, it is worth noting that Belarus is still, I think, the only country in Europe that institutes the death penalty. The number of people executed actually doubled last year\u2014to four. Assurances that Belarus is seeking to have a moratorium on the imposition of the death penalty have been rather disproved by its recent actions, and that too is a considerable stain on its record and prevents it from joining the Council of Europe<\/a> among other things.<\/p>\n

The explanatory memorandum for these sanctions names four individuals. The first three\u2014Yury Zakharanka, Viktar Hanchar and Anatol Krasouski\u2014were all opposition<\/a> politicians who were previously quite close to President Lukashenko<\/a>, but found themselves in opposition to him and then died in 1999. Some were abducted, and the courts have now ruled that they were almost certainly murdered. Quite exactly what happened, we still do not know.<\/p>\n

The fourth individual named on the explanatory memorandum and the regulations is Dzmitry Zavadski<\/a>, and I mention him specifically because although he was President Lukashenko\u2019s personal cameraman, he also practised widely as a journalist. As the Minister<\/a> and others may know, I am a very strong supporter of media freedom. I strongly welcome the initiative that the Foreign Secretary<\/a> has taken to make media freedom a priority of this Government to the extent of organising an international conference on it in July. The IPU, which I have the honour to chair, will be following that up.<\/p>\n

The death of Mr Zavadski is a terrible blot, but it is worth mentioning another individual who worked alongside him\u2014Pavel Sheremet<\/a>. Pavel Sheremet was another Belarusian journalist who fell out with the President. He was also a critic of President Putin<\/a> and a great friend of Boris Nemtsov<\/a> in Russia. He was assassinated in a car bomb in Kiev in 2016, and his murder is another example of the risks that journalists take and how they sometimes pay a price with their lives. We should always raise the issue of Pavel Sheremet. Quite who was responsible for his death is unclear\u2014he made a number of enemies among people who could well have been responsible\u2014but he was a Belarusian journalist. He was also one of the founders of Charter 97<\/a>, which is a human rights organisation that operates in Belarus. I met representatives of Charter 97 just a few weeks ago. Its founder was also killed, the editor-in-chief fled and is now in Poland, and access to its website is blocked in Belarus.<\/p>\n

The record in Belarus is not good. I therefore certainly would not argue that sanctions should necessarily be lifted. However, I would say that we should keep them under review and that we should encourage where there are signs of progress. I hope that there is some movement towards greater liberalisation and away from the alliance with Russia. On that subject, I will not bore the Minister by repeating what has come up regularly in these debates but merely say that the sanctions against Russia remain of huge importance. We await the Government\u2019s announcement of the implementation of the Magnitsky sanctions following the passage of the necessary legislation in this House. If ever we needed an example of why those sanctions against Russia remain of huge importance, it was the Minister\u2019s excellent response to the debate that we had last week on the Russian annexation of Crimea. He will know that within hours of that, the Russians announced that they were going to make passports available to people living in Donbass. I am very pleased that the Foreign Office<\/a>made clear our condemnation of that further provocation by Russia against the people and Government of Ukraine<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I strongly support these sanctions. However, I was keen to take this opportunity to put it on the record that although the sanctions against Belarus are justified, there are nevertheless small signs of progress.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

John Whittingdale Conservative, Maldon  7:02 pm, 29th April 2019  It is a pleasure to hear that the importance of rolling over these sanctions is supported on both sides of the House. My right hon. Friend Alistair Burt spoke with considerable knowledge and authority about the sanctions against Syria. I will concentrate on another of the three countries on whom […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1533,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-speeches"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=582"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1779,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582\/revisions\/1779"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}