{"id":4316,"date":"2025-02-13T15:12:56","date_gmt":"2025-02-13T15:12:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/?p=4316"},"modified":"2026-03-06T12:38:47","modified_gmt":"2026-03-06T12:38:47","slug":"sir-john-whittingdale-mp-questions-defence-minister-on-ukraine-security-guarantees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/?p=4316","title":{"rendered":"Ukraine Security Guarantees"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

James Cartlidge Shadow Secretary of State for Defence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Urgent Question): To ask the\u00a0Secretary of State\u00a0for Defence if he will make a statement on Ukraine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maria Eagle The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yesterday, at the Ukraine Defence Contact Group, chaired by the Defence Secretary, we saw almost 50 nations and partners standing together. Ukraine is backed by the members of the group, and by billions of dollars-worth of arms and ammunition that have been committed to keep its warfighters equipped. That will increase pressure on Putin, help force him to the table, and bring a sustainable peace closer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We were pleased that Secretary Hegseth confirmed the US\u2019s continued commitment to the group, to Ukraine\u2019s pursuit of what he called \u201ca durable peace\u201d, and to the importance of security guarantees. We heard his call for European nations to step up; we are, and we will. NATO allies pledged \u20ac40 billion in 2024, and went on to provide \u20ac50 billion. The majority of that came from European nations, while non-US NATO allies boosted wider defence spending by 20% in just the last year, so Europe is stepping up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, we saw a clear commitment to ratcheting up the pressure on Putin, using both military and economic tools. We all agree that 2025 will be the critical year for Ukraine. At this crucial moment, we will not step back, but step up our support for Ukraine. President Trump and President Zelensky have both spoken of their desire to achieve \u201cpeace through strength\u201d. The commitments made yesterday provide the collective strength that we need to achieve peace. For our part, the UK will spend \u00a34.5 billion on military support for Ukraine this year, which is more than ever before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We have now provided more than 500,000 artillery shells, worth over \u00a31.5 billion. Yesterday, the Defence Secretary announced that we will provide an additional \u00a3150 million of new firepower, including drones, tanks and air-to-air missiles. Ukraine\u2019s security matters to global security. That is why the vital Ukraine Defence Contact Group coalition of 50 nations and partners stretches from the Indo-Pacific to South America. This war was never about the fate of just one nation. When the border of one country is redrawn by force, it undermines the security of all nations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US is serious about stability in the Indo-Pacific, as are we. That is why the Prime Minister announced that the carrier strike group will go there next year. If aggression goes unchecked on one continent, it emboldens regimes on another, so on stepping up for Ukraine, we are, and we will. On stepping up for European security, we are, and we will.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

James Cartlidge Shadow Secretary of State for Defence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am grateful to you, Mr Speaker, for granting this urgent question; we are in recess next week, and the day that we return will be the third anniversary of Putin\u2019s unprovoked illegal invasion of Ukraine. In the past three years, Russia has inflicted unimaginable suffering on Ukraine. There has been military and civilian loss of life on a vast scale, at the hands of a dictator oblivious to consequences and only too willing to sacrifice his own soldiers to the meat grinder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the face of so many casualties and so much pain, of course we all want peace. We all want the senseless slaughter to stop, and for Ukraine to once again thrive and enjoy the trappings of peace and prosperity, which we all take for granted. It is clear that an end to this suffering is a goal that President Trump wishes to achieve rapidly; he set that out to the American people before securing their support for his election to the White House, and for a second mandate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We remain 100% steadfast in our support for Ukraine, and in our backing for the Government in delivering that; they gave us the same backing when in opposition. We agree in principle with them and believe, as we stressed repeatedly in government, that it is for the Ukrainians to decide the timing and the terms of any negotiations on ending the war. Does the Minister agree that negotiations without the direct involvement of Ukraine would be unthinkable? What more can the Minister say about how the Government will work with allies to ensure that any negotiations are driven by the primacy of Ukraine\u2019s needs, not least given its status as the democratic nation invaded, without provocation, by a dictator?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We welcome the news from the Minister about the commitments given by other European NATO nations this week, but is not President Trump right to consistently highlight the point that some NATO nations spend far below what is expected and required on defence? Will the Minister assure the House that the Government, using every lever at their disposal, will remind all NATO members that a win for Putin in any settlement may bring a temporary end to the conflict, but will not make the world a safer place? Far from it. It would be an illusion of peace, and would be likely to send a very dangerous signal to other potential adversaries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, the position expressed by both the US President and his Defence Secretary yesterday has huge implications for our defence policy. They have made it abundantly clear that the US will play no role in any future peacekeeping effort in Ukraine, should that be necessary. Although the Government will of course be cautious about contemplating publicly the implications of that, is not the key point straightforward: if higher defence spending was urgent before, it is now critical?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maria Eagle The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I welcome the fact that, in the main, there is still consensus across this House on supporting Ukraine. That has been a tremendously important part of the support that we have given over the last three years, and before, to the Ukrainians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The hon. Gentleman said that there should be no negotiation about Ukraine without Ukraine; my right hon. Friend the Defence Secretary made that clear in his remarks yesterday. NATO\u2019s job is to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position for any talks, but there can be no negotiation about Ukraine without Ukraine\u2019s involvement. We want to see a durable peace and no return to conflict and aggression. That is the only way in which this war can end, with the kind of security that President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have referred to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

John Whittingdale Conservative, Maldon<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1994, Russia \u2014along with the UK and the US\u2014signed the Budapest memorandum, pledging to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. Given Russia\u2019s flagrant breach of that undertaking, why should Ukraine believe a word that Putin says without concrete security guarantees?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maria Eagle The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The right hon. Gentleman is correct that there must be security guarantees, and the US Defence Secretary said as much. These are all matters for any negotiations that take place. Of course, we will be supporting Ukraine, and we have made it quite clear that there cannot be a peace that does not involve Ukraine or that it does not support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Please see the link below to watch a clip of Sir John’s question:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n