{"id":318,"date":"2014-03-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-03-05T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.johnwhittingdale.co.uk\/?p=318"},"modified":"2021-08-23T09:53:48","modified_gmt":"2021-08-23T09:53:48","slug":"parliamentary-privilege-sp-699843308","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/?p=318","title":{"rendered":"Parliamentary Privilege"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"st_o193\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14030568000095\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"140305-0001.htm_spnew152\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14030568000183\"><\/a><strong>Mr Whittingdale:<\/strong> On a point of order, Mr Speaker.  You may recall that in November last year, I raised a point of order to express  my concern that Dato Makudi had been given leave to take to the Court of Appeal  his action for defamation that related to remarks made by Lord Triesman to the  Football Association, in which he&nbsp;<span style=\"line-height: 1.3em;\">merely referred to statements that he had made to the Select Committee on  Culture, Media and Sport about possible corruption in FIFA. Those remarks were,  of course, made under privilege.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"stpa_o20\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"140305-0001.htm_para20\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14030568000096\"><\/a>At that  time, I expressed my concern that the action represented a significant threat to  the privilege conferred on Members and, indeed, on witnesses who appear before  Select Committees of this House, and that it could have the severe effects of  preventing us from exposing truth and giving witnesses the impression that they  do not enjoy the protection of parliamentary privilege. You were sufficiently  concerned, Mr Speaker, to make a submission to the Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"stpa_o21\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"140305-0001.htm_para21\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14030568000097\"><\/a>As you  may be aware, Mr Speaker, the Court of Appeal has reached a judgment in which it  is clearly stated that Lord Triesman\u2019s remarks were covered by article 9 of the  Bill of Rights. I believe that that is a significant re-establishment of the  rights of this House. I wonder whether you would like to make a statement in the  light of that.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"anchor-column noCont\" name=\"column_906\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"st_o194\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14030568000098\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"140305-0001.htm_spnew153\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14030568000184\"><\/a><strong>Mr Speaker:<\/strong> I am very grateful to the hon.  Gentleman for his point of order. As he rightly says, I shared his grave  concern, not principally on behalf of Lord Triesman, but on behalf of the House,  that a threat to parliamentary privilege and, therefore, to Parliament was  entailed. I did, as I indicated to the hon. Gentleman was my intention, cause  representations to be made to the Court of Appeal. It was, of course, a matter  for the court and I am absolutely delighted that it found in favour of Lord  Triesman. That was a victory not just for Lord Triesman, but for the precious  principle of parliamentary privilege and for Parliament itself. It was a very  important day, and the hon. Gentleman is right to celebrate it and to give me  the opportunity, on behalf of the House, to do the same.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mr Whittingdale: On a point of order, Mr Speaker. You may recall that in November last year, I raised a point of order to express my concern that Dato Makudi had been given leave to take to the Court of Appeal his action for defamation that related to remarks made by Lord Triesman to the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1533,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-speeches"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=318"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2045,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318\/revisions\/2045"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}