{"id":316,"date":"2014-02-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-02-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.johnwhittingdale.co.uk\/?p=316"},"modified":"2021-08-09T15:59:23","modified_gmt":"2021-08-09T15:59:23","slug":"deregulation-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/?p=316","title":{"rendered":"Deregulation Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"st_o211\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14020325000036\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"140203-0001.htm_spnew194\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14020325000382\"><\/a><strong><strong>Mr John Whittingdale<\/strong> (Maldon) (Con):<\/strong> My  right hon. Friend said that the Bill\u2019s provisions were being introduced on the  advice of those who were most affected by the regulations, but he will be aware  of the concern that has been expressed by a wide range of media and broadcasting  organisations about the effect of clause 47 in removing important journalistic  protections. Is there anything he can say to reassure them that it will not have  the effect they fear?<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"st_o212\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14020325000037\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"140203-0001.htm_spnew195\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14020325000383\"><\/a><strong>Mr Letwin:<\/strong> I am grateful to my hon. Friend, the  Chairman of the Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport, for raising that  issue, which is indeed important. It was a late entrant, in the sense that it  was no part of the intention of clause 47 to have the effect that some of the  media organisations are worried about. Those organisations have been worried  that the clause would obviate the need for both parties to be in court when a  court orders what is called a production order, which typically requires, for  example, a bank to produce the accounts of a person accused of a particular  malfeasance, where those accounts are relevant to the trial.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"stpa_o34\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"140203-0001.htm_para34\"><\/a><a class=\"anchor\" name=\"14020325000038\"><\/a>In the  case that the media are concerned about, a production order would be used to ask  a media organisation to produce some piece of information it holds. Those media  organisations were worried that they would no longer have the guarantee of their  day in court to contest such a production order, because the effect of clause 47  would be to replace the need for the existence of primary legislation governing  inter partes rules with the criminal procedure rules committee. The media were  afraid that the criminal procedure rules committee might in some way weaken the  inter partes rules. I have good news for my hon. Friend and his Committee, and\u00a0<span style=\"line-height: 1.3em;\">indeed for the media organisations\u2014which, incidentally, I have offered to  meet later in the week or next week. As it was no part of the intention of  clause 47 to do that, we are now looking for ways specifically to exempt  journalism and all such media items from the clause. If I may, I would like to  discuss with him and his Committee the precise drafting of that change, so that  we can be sure that the media organisations themselves and the Select Committee  are content with the changes we make.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mr John Whittingdale (Maldon) (Con): My right hon. Friend said that the Bill\u2019s provisions were being introduced on the advice of those who were most affected by the regulations, but he will be aware of the concern that has been expressed by a wide range of media and broadcasting organisations about the effect of clause [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=316"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1091,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316\/revisions\/1091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johnwhittingdale.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}